Find a Lawyer

M. RAFIQUE MALIK versus SURRIYYA KHANUM

Sections 4, 10 (3) and 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXVII, Rr 2 and 3 Civil Procedure Code The nature of the action before the application for rent control, not the 1908 Extent Rental Controller Court. In the earlier proceedings, it should be understood that the rent controller was not bound by the provisions of OXVII, RR 2 and 3, the CPC rent controller owned its own procedure, however, it was important that the parties were reasonable. In order to provide a reasonable opportunity for a hearing within the boundaries, such controversial principles of integrity and equality must guide the rent controller in performing his or her duties. In this case, the rent controller did not refrain from such rules. The tenant was provided with eight opportunities to present his evidence but failed to do so and at the last date of the hearing he did not appear to himself, the rent controller in such case specifically approved in the case under question. Was correct, by which he did not withhold the evidence of the tenants nor faced such an order from any jurisdictional defect nor any violation of the law evident in the face of the record. Was trapped best advocate from Kasur lawyer