Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ZAHID HUSSAIN SHAH versus GHULAM MURTAZA ASGHAR


Article 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 350 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was a dispute that the High Court had no jurisdiction to intervene in the trial. ? The case is fresh and not on the evidence already recorded by the special trial court's quick trial lawyer for the defendants (applicants) to deal with the evidence already entered by the special court. Was dealt with and no decision was made by him. The High Court had directed the trial court to decide the trial on the basis of the material already on file under the High Court order regarding the aforementioned legal aspects of the case, and, therefore, did not demand any intervention and to appeal. 'S leave was denied accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.