WAZIRAN versus KALU
Evidence of the execution of the gift of the Mahomedan Gift Gift in favor of his wife, except that there was no close relative other than a sub-relationship, therefore, as a gift in favor of his wife, who was his life-partner was extraordinary. It cannot be understood that the husband's intention was proved by the contents of the gift process, in which case, the transfer of ownership of the gift from the husband to the wife was completed if it was merely written in the act of gift. The burden of forgery and fraud is always on the same person who alleged that such a burden was not excluded. There was no reason for the donor to commit suicide and as such, the property in question was canceled, so, legally, his wife was transferred by anonymity.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Rohri lawyer