Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD PARVEZ versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 164 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 confession offense, recording the statement was detained by the police for 8 days in the crime of confession. A confession statement was recorded, he made no attempt. In order to ascertain the actual date of arrest of the accused magistrate it was also admitted that he had not physically examined the accused by the police magistrate to ascertain any torture request or No, he didn't even remember if he checked the medical certificate about the suspect's inspection before recording the accused's confession. The magistrate's conduct shows that he did not record the confessional statement and did not observe the required formal proceedings, since the date of which the police behaved in not disclosing the formal arrest of the accused on which he was actually arrested and confessed. The record-making magistrate's conduct has rendered this confessional statement as valid and not the original document on which the accused could be sentenced, based on Ott, especially when he did not find any co-ordination with another quarter. divorce advocates from Tarbela lawyer