Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Pressure on 103 terrorist activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), the evidence of the accused was appreciated and convicted on charges that were loaded. Kalashnikov was a rifle. The alleged recovery testimony recovered from him was a subordinate police officer who was also the complainant in the case and no independent and respected person from the area was summoned and in such cases The search was to witness the recovery, which was an important part of the evidence. Independent, undesirable and respectable persons of the location express and against the provisions of section 103, CRPC, in addition to better grounds on the Inquiry Officer's ability and warrant, and in exceptional cases. Violation cannot be ignored. Section 103, CR PC or, more precisely, the shadow search and recovery in the case, the unreliable envy officer shared triple positions in himself, as he was not only an investigating officer, but also a complaint in this case. There was also a witness and witness while in order to restrict himself to such triple positions, it was necessary for the investigating officer to give a reasonable explanation in this regard. Calling respected persons in the area eligible for search and recovery and their testimony was a deliberate mistake, especially when the accused alleged that the village resident was present, but neither Was not affiliated with the recovery of the case nor did the possibility of the suspect being investigated as a witness be falsely implicated in the case, thus excluding the Minor when you need a advocate from Ludhan lawyer