ANWAR MUHAMMAD versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE
Section 4 Advertising Remarks Expansion Appeal Government employees timely filed their first appeal against the Divisional Superintendent for removal of negative remarks, but were rejected by public servants, who realized they were authorized in this case. The Appellate Authority was not the divisional superintendent, but the chief engineer. , Then an appeal was filed before the Chief Engineer, who was a competent appellate authority more than five years after his first appeal was rejected, and instead of challenging the same appellate authority before the Service Tribunal, dismissed his appeal. Was also rejected. Representation was made more than six years before the authorized appellate authority and the last representation was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
