Find a Lawyer

ALTAF HUSSAIN versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

R 4 Minor penalty award A government employee was convicted of stopping two employees, thus giving him the right to sue a public servant after issuing notices and inquiring against them. ? That in the original showcase notice, the penalty was not identified, but it was specified by the corrigendum, which course was illegal, because the reason for not mentioning the specific penalty in the notice does not invalidate the notice and Mentioning it is enough. The widespread penalties refer to other conflicts of public servants who have only one increment under R 4 (1) (a) (ii) of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, because of the increase in this rule. And neither did the increment. In view of the fact that under the General Clause Act, 1897, the singular contains the plural of words, so it will increase by one or more. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kalam lawyer