Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD EJAZ versus SECRETARY, CABINET DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

R 2 (4) Employees who were employed as telephonic operators were dismissed from employment after issuing show cause notices and inquiring against them on allegations of corruption on the basis of which a public servant was employed. Was dismissed. Sitting with a female wife of a co-worker in their flat who was not their relative and they did not have to stay because they both denied the incident of the woman sitting in the public servant's flat, but They have no complaints. Any action was ever filed by her husband, who was a public servant of the appellant, and such action was deemed unnecessary by the authority, and if by any means the authority If there is a complaint. It could have informed law enforcement agencies about the proper course of action in the case, but the authority should not have considered the police employee's hole, who said that the woman, who was his sister's friend, told her. Knows well and tells her to sit. While he was preparing to go to his hometown, the woman stated that she was sitting in a government employee's flat because she, too, wanted to go to her village with her. The entered position was the woman found in a government employee's flat. Was. It cannot be said about the motive or motive behind and on its own, especially when no allegation was made of any of the employees, the public servants were not exempt from the investigative duty and for that purpose The incident did not occur during the flight to my flat immigration advocates from Hattar lawyer