Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAHIR versus D.I: G. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, LAHORE

R 16 28 Employee dismissed The public servant was a police constable and one night while he was on guard duty at the train station, he entered the women's waiting room and tried to treat a female passenger with his children. Was sleeping Through the woman, her husband woke up and resisted, which the accused slapped on his face and other passengers also witnessed the incident and another police constable also reported the matter to the relevant Section H, department proceedings. Was launched and the accused presented. After inquiring by the Superintendent Railway Police on the basis of statements made against the accused and the prosecution's witnesses and considering the defense, the Inquiry Officer found the accused Superintendent of Police guilty after considering the inquiry officer's search. Permanent service of a civil servant of two years and shifted the accused to another station agri The government employee, with the order of the police superintendent, filed an appeal against the DPG, according to which the DIG gave the accused through the superintendent police. Not agreeing to the sentence, the Railway Police issued a show cause notice to the Railway Police in exercise of their amending powers under 8 16 28. Rolls 1980 called for the accused to explain the reason why his sentence should not be extended to dismiss him. The accused public servant submitted his response to issue a notice of the reason; the DIG dismissed him from employment if he was not satisfied with the response of the accused public servant. , All actions taken against the civil servant were in accordance with the law and there were no deficiencies in the operation. solicitors from Naukundi lawyer