Find a Lawyer

NOOR ELAHI versus CHAIRMAN, WAPDA

14 and 19 Impact of Retained Government Residence Over a Period by a Retired Government Employer A Public Employee Despite Retirement and Retirement of Occupied Possibilities by Government Employees Despite More Than Six Months of Term Assigned by the Government Demanding Occupation Unauthorized Occupation of a residential job requires the police to take necessary action against the civil servant, claiming the standard rent as well as the associated employment charges for the period of his unauthorized occupation. She is retiring at least four years before her actual retirement date Is Because of the incorrect date of his birth on the service record, he appealed against his illegal retirement to the appellate authority and, at the same time, the authority to retain the residence until the decision of the son of a public servant in his employment. Permission was sought from The Authority also applied for DI's allotment. Residential Houses claim that under R14 of the Allotment Rules, it was entitled to its allotment, but the Authority did not reject the request which remained in the possession of the residence. In the hope that either his son would be allotted or that he himself would either be allowed to remain on his premature retirement appeal settlement, no irregularities were committed. Due to the strange circumstances of the matter, government employees will not be charged by the authority with the charges, but instead the ordinary rent. To be received. Because of this intermittent self-authority imposed a duty on the residence of civil servants online advocate from Lower Dir lawyer