Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD INAYAT GONDAL versus REGISTRAR LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE

Section Constitution Constitution Pakistan, Article 1 (185) officer Judicial Officer dismissed from employment Appellate Service Tribunal Preliminary hearing Appeal sought by Judicial Officer Judicial High Court interference in administrative matters The hearing of the petitioner's applicant was severely hampered by his dismissal and his service appeal had not yet been heard by the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, therefore, by the Supreme Court. An appropriate observation can be made that their appeal be heard at an early date The interference in the affairs of the K-High Court was generally slow. The Supreme Court directed the Judicial Officer to file a complaint before the Chief Justice High Court seeking appeal for leave to appeal. The hearing was disposed of with the same observation. A petition was filed, the Supreme Court said in truth that the Chief Justice HC contemplated approving the appropriate direction for hearing of the Judicial Officer's service appeal through the tribunal at the earliest convenience. Can \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• MUHAMMAD MOHSIN GHUMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Home Secretary, Lahore 2013 PLC(CS) 1076
• GHULAM SHABBIR v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2013 PLC(CS) 1087
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs v. MUHAMMAD AZAM CHATTHA 2013 PLC(CS) 1095
• Mrs. AKRAM YASEEN v. ASIF YASEEN 2013 SCMR 1099
• DAWA KHAN v. MUHAMMAD TAYYAB 2013 SCMR 1113
• MUZAFFAR KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLC(CS) 1115
• Qazi MUSHTAQ AHMAD AWAN v. ABDUL GHAFFAR 2013 SCMR 1120
• CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY v. RAB NAWAZ 2013 SCMR 1124

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Jehlum lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes