Section 13 (3) Convention of Conviction (10 of 1984), Arts 79 and 81 suits sought before the conclusion of the trial, Notice of Requirement for Proof of Proof of two true witnesses to confirm the notice of publication of the petition, only one In order to prove the notice of intent of the prosecution on the creation / examination of the witnesses, as it appeared in the testimony box that it supported the contents of the notice of the district publication, the terms of section 13 Accordingly, two witnesses need to be examined to prove the evidence. () The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was satisfied with the Pre-Empathy Act, 1987, and that according to Article 81 of the Law Shaheed, 1984, if any document presented in the evidence was admissible, then the Executive had the valid terms of section 13 There was no need to prove. 3) Under the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Impression Act, 1987, two fact witnesses were required to prove the contents of the notice of the student, which was mandatory in nature, to prove the Article 79F document of the Convention of 1984 For the two witnesses to testify in court, without any reason and / or without explanation, the absence of any witness for the notice of acquittal would violate the requirement to admit. In the present case, the examination of the author by pre-emptor, in any case, for the notice of the accused in the investigation of one of the witnesses, which was in violation of section 13 (3) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Impression Act 1987 , It cannot be declared to be in accordance with the language of Section 13 (3) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Emission Act 1987, read with Article 79 of the Martyrdom, 1984 decision of the trial court, by which premature Removal deadline
