Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

M.Y. MALIK & CO. versus SPENDLOURS INTERNATIONAL


Pakistan's Constitution 1973 Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OXV, R1 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXLVII, R1 Appeal for review of the decisions of the Supreme Court decision Itition that this controversial The decision given by the Supreme Court in the judgment was based on some misconception of the fact that such a dispute would have occurred on the theory of record; the Supreme Court refused to make a claim for the disputed amount from the High Court. This was done by ignoring important pieces. Therefore, in this respect, the requisite review Supreme Court reviewed its decision to the extent that the specific amount paid by the applicants was retained, which in turn led to the decision by the High Court. Was approved in favor of the respondents. Applicants who have already paid the respondents will remain in relation to the remaining amount

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Guddu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.