ABDUL RAUF GHAURI versus KISHWAR SULTANA
Decision of Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVIII and Attachment before OXXXVII, R3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was allowed to appear for the plaintiff in the collection of money in the jurisdiction of the summary and the bank guarantee The case was defended on par. In this regard the Bank Guarantee failed to the extent claimed by the Applicants in the review, in which the terms of the agreement between the parties were not justified as a condition of presenting the Bank Guarantee. In defense of the case, the defendants were ready to offer any solvent security to the satisfaction of the court in order to uphold the leave of the High Court and the trial court in the application for leave to defend against the amount claimed in the suit. To the extent possible. It imposed the terms of the bank guarantee as a term for defendant's defense of the shutdown, the hearing order was amended by the Supreme Court. The extent to which the defense will be discharged will be considered. The defendant has been granted the condition to present any solvency security at trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Dunyapur lawyer