Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD INAYAT

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 426 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 435/34 Pressure on Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 (1) of the High Court to the accused There was no jurisdiction to admit. The bail granted during the sentence of his appeal was directed against the conviction and punishment granted by the Special Court under the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, and in this case there were no exceptions to the above. ? Syed Qaim Ali Shah (1992 SCMR 2192), claiming that there is no evidence on the use of mineral oil in the commission of this crime, does not appear in the schedule, according to the trial court's findings. Has no power That the mineral oil and / or some explosive material used in the case is permissible under section 3 of the Evidence Act (now Section 2 of the Evidence Act, 1984), based on the material brought before the court. The High Court's order admitting the four corn proof testimony figures to bail the accused on the eve of his appeal was accordingly signed by the apex court. top advocate from Shahkot lawyer