Assessing evidence for the purposes of suspending a conviction under section 426, Section 302 (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3), imposing a sentence, the PC scope suspect Sentenced under 302. b), PPC and life imprisonment The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 426, CR PCC, which is why the injuries attributed to them were made in section 337F (iii), PPC. Was sentenced to three years in prison; the wounds attributed to him were to non-vital parts of the body. That they did not repeat the hatchet attack. The injuries attributed to him were not confirmed by medical evidence, and that they had already reviewed the fine for more than 4/2 years. The high court suspended the accused's conviction and discussed the evidence of the prosecution in a manner that was appellant's defense. The court went into deep appreciation of the High Court evidence, which could not be exercised in a petition under section 426; the High Court in its decision could have possibly ignored the PC observations in the appeal case. Was likely to be targeted. The question of whether the victim was hurt in the FIR and the evidence given during the trial is whether the ocular account has been deeply appreciated that the appellate court stayed with the appellate court during the hearing. Should have In the present case, the suspended order of the High Court was set aside and the action was given to detain the accused and send them to judicial lockup. \ r \ n
