MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus NASEER HUSSAIN
Evidence of the execution of the evidence of the Law E-Evidence Order 1984 Arts 17 and 79 The evidence of the document was not proven to be lost and the permission was not obtained as there was no secondary evidence, copy of the original document was not admissible in the evidence. 17 and 79 In order to establish the financial responsibility for the proof of the document, the Es document must be verified by two witnesses. In order to prove such a document, the plaintiff has to summon at least two witnesses and, if the document is not proved in accordance with the law, must be excluded from consideration.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kohat lawyer
