MUHAMMAD ASLAM ABRO versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD MUQEEM KHOSA
Sections 39 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 225, 185 (3) and 199 Election for the seat of the Provincial Assembly The polling station at the polling station results in financial matters, errors and math errors that result from the Presiding Officer forming the results of the High Court. The petitioner and respondent received 15743 votes for the provincial assembly seat while the respondents got 15640 votes while the respondents were the presiding officer and the district. Filing a recount request before the Returning Officer. Based on the votes at one of the polling stations, it was concluded that the stability, errors and mathematical errors accumulated were not made by the Election Commission of Pakistan, after which the respondent again for the counting. A constitutional petition was filed before the High Court. The High Court allowed the constitutional petition and directed that the vote be re-counted and that notification should be given (about the successful candidate) only after the re-counting of votes at the polling station, the petitioner's position was that of the High Court. Prior to filing a constitutional petition, the respondents had already submitted applications to the Presiding Officer and the District Returning Officer, who were alleged to have failed to deliver the results at various polling stations. In such cases, the High Court should not have interfered in the proceedings of the Election Commission of Pakistan in view of the bar under Article 225 of the Constitution, and that the only remedy available to the respondents was the election tribunal before the Tribunal.
