MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH M/O WORKS AND HOUSING
Regs 26, Schedule D, Clause 3 (a), (b) and (c) of the Karachi Development Authority Order (V of 1957) (since canceled), Arts 40 (4), (5), (6) and 52A Sub Division and any residential plot as a businessman was obliged to lease the plot in legal order by notice in the newspapers in the headline by inviting the public on the condition that it be leased on 26 6 1964. This plot will not be distributed to most except with the prior consent of this agreement. The President may be subject to Pakistan and such terms, when the lender is in force, from time to time Lucy has approached the relevant authority, in which the relevant authorities agreed to apply the plot to the sub-division 22 4 1991 The original plot was officially split in 1991. In 1991, Lizzie applied for the commercialization of all the divided plots, which were approved by the relevant ministry and the Housing Society in March 1992, saying that The commercial plot was sold to someone else who sold it. The appellants had begun construction of a building on the requisite commercial plot for the present applicants, when the respondents filed a constitutional petition before the High Court stating that the relevant plot was divided into two parts, namely, the relevant authority. The plan was without approval and the Environment Environment High Court allowed the constitutional application, relying on the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 1979, and decided that an English and a Urdu-based notice published in leading local newspapers were made public. Changes to the original plot were made without inviting objects
