S.M. IMAMUL ISLAM versus PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI
Section 25A and Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Complaint Request Limitation Complaint was received by the worker in 1983 while the notice of complaint was given in 1987 to prove that the notice of complaint was sent on time. Failure to perform the work was relied upon by the administration and the collective bargaining agent for the termination of the alleged settlement but could not be proved by making a copy of the request or postal receipt. Application is not subject to Section B 65B, Industrial Relations Ordinance and Limitations Section. The act was made by the worker, the appellant only gave the employer notice of the complaint and failed to enforce the other employees. When his complaint request was approved, he feared being affected when the employees complained. The request was removed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from FR Kohat lawyer