S. GHULAM DASTGIR & SONS versus UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD.
Insurance Act 1938 Sections 53 (1) and 2 (6) of the Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), S: 305 Termination of the jurisdiction of the insurance company = Section 53 (1), referred to the court in the Insurance Act, 1938 That is, they are either the principal civil court of the original jurisdiction in a district or high court that has a common original civil jurisdiction that has no original civil jurisdiction, Section 33, Insurance Act, 38 1938 Companies The Ordinance of 1984 is not under the definition of court for the purposes of 1984. There is no difference between a High Court having a general jurisdiction and who has no such jurisdiction, which appears in both the mergers, namely the Insurance Act 1938 and the Companies Ordinance, 1984, for the purpose of the Court. Jurisdiction. The termination of the company, the provision of the Insurance Act, 1938, is a special provision with respect to the court, under which the insurance company will have jurisdiction to adjourn. Overriding the general provisions made under the Companies Act, 1984, the High Court has no civilian jurisdiction under it, the NC shall have jurisdiction to entertain the petition to terminate the insurance company. And she will also hear a petition to be adopted before the District Court. The applicant was returned to appear before the insurance company in a court of competent area
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
