Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ZARIN GUL versus MALIK SAN


In the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, Article 175 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was barred by the plaintiff to remove such blockade, the trial court appealed to the trial court. The decision was put aside and dismissed. And under the decree, the trial court of the plaintiff who had affirmed the appellate court's decision in the court, accepted the High Court in Shamila Diyas and the plaintiff was entitled to use that route as co-owner. The plaintiff had no right or justification to block this route. Appeal Court and High Court refused to appeal the appeal because of any weakness on record

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Muridkay lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.