Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID versus THE STATE

Section 365 A / 34 Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act (Special Courts) Act (1975), Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975, Section 8 Memorandum of Detention of the accused was not proved on record. , Did not support it and the investigating officer made a contradictory statement and the arrest and recovery of the case was also suspected as the trial court did not rely on it during separate proceedings against the accused under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance. The 1965 accused was never placed in the identity parade before the magistrate and only served on the identity memo. Or, therefore, terrorist activities (the first part of the first condition of Article 8 of the pressure of special courts) can not be fulfilled. In 1975, the investigation into this case was also subjected to dishonesty, the charges were dismissed in the circumstances. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Lawrence pur lawyer