Find a Lawyer

ZAFARULLAH KHAN versus ABU BAKAR

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 16 (1) (2) invaded the tenant's defense of the tenant because it failed to collect the rent in the central case in compliance with the temporary control order of the rent controller. There has been a dispute between the parties before. By refusing to receive rent at the rate of rent and the rate offered by the landlord, the tenant was being deposited by the tenant in various cases. In the absence of a default payment, rent controller's letter and spirits order in the absence of a rent payment, the tenant had only an unintentional error and the rental order was non-compliant. Can't be equal. Such a default; if any, was a technical default and not a deliberate default. And, in the circumstances, banning defense action and ordering the removal of the remote controller by the legislature was not an appropriate ruling that an individual should be punished simply for wrongdoing. Intuitively, the motives, as intentions and mens rea, were extremely important ingredients, which demanded fines and both cases were lacking. pakistani advocates Talagang lawyer