MAJID UR REHMAN versus THE STATE
Witnesses identified them in the Parade of Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Property The 49th Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) on the very next day of the arrest of the accused on bail. Was Although the contents of the FIR through the Recovery and Identification Parade, which did not attract Section 17 (3) of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979, the accused's crime was still in the scope of section 20 of the said ordinance. came. As well as the prohibition clause of section 497 (1), CCP Bell was denied the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Haveli Kahuta lawyer
