Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Civil Procedure Code Order VII of CPC Plants O VII, R 14, OXIII, RR l, 2 and Section 115 were allowed to tender the proof of review documents in the interdisciplinary order containing the revenue record and This was demonstrated in stages after the accuracy of the VII was delivered. R14 and OXIII, Rr 1 & 2, CPC have clearly indicated that the parties behind these clauses of legal proceedings were to eliminate the possibility of filing false documents in the final phase of litigation. In this case, the points had formed the revenue record of the underground land. For the mere decision of the matter, the evidence was tendered and exhibited, the production of which was necessary and the evidence contained in the proceedings contained in the provisions of OVII, R14 and O XIII Could have been allowed to tender with. 1, CPC was not absolute for late production of documents. The courts were empowered by the provision of OI XII, R 2, CPC to exercise their discretion in pursuing justice and to allow appropriate documentation to be brought to the record where the parties sued. Failed to present these documents at the first hearing. The court did not make any mistake in the law in exercising its discretion while admitting these documents to the appellate court, however, could record their own season against the confession of the documents in such a situation. And neglecting the same case and recording the judicial decision in the case of admission. Subject to scrutiny of any documents by the trial court famous supreme court advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer