Find a Lawyer

AYUB AZEEZ KHAN versus JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL

As per the provisions of Article 4 (4) (Fundamental Rights No. 5) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974 and 44 applicants being a resident of Indian occupied Kashmir, they enter Pakistan on an Indian passport and then transfer from Azad Kashmir to applicant transfer. The High Court refuses to be attracted to the authority. Pushing them back or sending them to Indian-occupied Kashmir and allowing them to permanently reside in Azad Kashmir clearly showed that the applicants were citizens of the state of Jammu and Kashmir and because of this status they were relocated. Was allocated in favor of. And to travel across the state without interruption and restriction, applicants were given a legitimate right to reside anywhere in the state or in any part of the state, including Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Under the laws of the state, the applicants have. Applicants of the State of Jammu and Kashmir cannot be forced to return to Indian occupied Kashmir as a state subject, notwithstanding the fact that they had traveled to Pakistan and Azad Kashmir on an Indian passport and through Pakistan visa. Traveling by itself will not restrict applicants' rights. Azad Kashmir was living in the Azad Kashmir Authority, the Prime Minister of the Azad Kashmir Government, the Prime Minister of the Azad Kashmir Government supported the applicants and the administrative officials had nothing to say against the Home Office of Pakistan, though it had the authority Live in a family. Pakistan, however, does not have the authority to do that how to become a advocate from Daud Khel lawyer