Find a Lawyer

REHMAT JAN versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION MANGLA DAM RAISING PROJECT, MIRPUR, ISLAMGARH, MIRPUR

Arts 2 (c), 102 and 103 Oral as well as documentary evidence are also available on record in relation to the fact that preferential treatment will demand the propagation of the law that in the presence of direct documentary evidence, consider other evidence. Will not necessarily be the rule.

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• BARKAT ALI v. SULTAN MEHMOOD 2013 CLC 1091
• ABDUL HAFEEZ v. SHAMAILA BIBI 2013 MLD 1148
• MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. ZAREEDA BI 2013 CLC 1186
• QASIM HUSSAIN SHAH v. AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary AJ&K, Muzaffarabad 2013 MLD 1204
• Mirza ABDUL AZIZ v. MUHAMMAD AYUB 2013 YLR 1226
• ALI UMAR v. Mst. MINNI 2013 CLC 1236
• QADIR BAKHSH v. The STATE through Shaukat 2013 YLR 1418
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM KHAN v. Mst. MUQARAB JAN 2013 MLD 1435

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates contact from Kundina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes