Section 5, Schedule and 14 Muslim Marriages Act (VIII of 1939), Section 2 (viii) The case of dissolution of marriage on the basis of oppression, evidence of the nature and scope of the defendant (husband) was as victimized. It was not proved by the accused (wife) on his behalf, because neither himself nor any of his witnesses have stated that the plaintiff (wife) has any claim on the person of the plaintiff (wife). Hurt. Brutal mentality indicated by husband was not required by law for proof of cruelty, false accusations against wife in marital affairs that she was a victim of bad character, which resulted in mental torture. ? And the loss of the plaintiff's mutual trust in support of the alleged atrocity led to witnesses who dismissed that the defendant's husband misbehaved with the plaintiff; the courts below, in the circumstances, justified her l Was proved
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
