A. XXIII, R 1 Specific Relief Act (in 1877), Section 8 suits the first application by a female plaintiff for the joint possession of the land to withdraw her limitation on the first application by the female plaintiff. Before making the second application, withdraw the first application on the basis that it was fraudulently dismissed by the trial court in order to accept the earlier application by the appellate court to the extent of the female plaintiff. The case was later dismissed by the female plaintiff on the basis of his resignation and re-judicial system by the trial court. Fresh trial by appellate court to dismiss. But the High Court allowed a female plaintiff to withdraw the application first and to seek remand for trial trial court for its decision before the court approves any order by the court. And the first application was direct in the matter of withdrawal. After hearing the case in the previous case and the court, the parties made the same decision against the female plaintiff to the extent that the previous case was wrongly or rightly decided by the trial court in the case of the return of the petition, After that his appeal was finalized and he was finalized. In the previous case, the challenging proceedings, which had already ended to the extent of the female plaintiff, were halted by the principle of the Chief Judiciary, and the Supreme Court set aside and reinstated the uncontested decision / order. Which was approved by the trial court and the appellate court.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
