AHMAD BAKHSH versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
The matter relating to the jurisdiction of section 164 SO Moto Amendment jurisdiction of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 against the Stability Scheme filed in the court of Additional Commissioner (Reinforcement) was still pending when the Member, Board of Revenue Member, Board of Revenue Another revision request was filed. Rejecting the amendment filed before him, stating that no further amendment is applicable to the Additional Commissioner on the occasion of the request for review, he still exercised the jurisdiction of the Moto in the amendment and contested the dispute. Instruct the stability authorities in relation to the matter if a review request was filed. One party and the same were rejected. The court cannot be said that if it complies with it, it has exercised its own jurisdiction in reviewing it, pending remission before the Additional Commissioner. In the presence of a pending review request, the Member Board of Revenue should not have decided the matter in practice. Modification of automotive power
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer