Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR SIDDIQUI versus STATE

Definition of Evidence of Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (2) Evidence Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161. Members of the raiding party have neither seen the accused paying the tainted money, nor heard the conversation between the complainant and the accused. At the time when the money changed hands, the evidence of the prosecution, therefore, did not encourage trust and it was not credible that the plaque taken by the accused in his statement appeared to be closer to the truth, evidence suggests. It turns out that the complainant was angry with the accused and the possibility of false opportunities could not be excluded, the accused was acquitted property advocates from Quetta lawyer