Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL

West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 The landlord demanded that the shop be opened by default on rent and as per the requirement of establishing a private business. (Attorney) agreed to sell the shop and received in advance in writing that the tenant would not pay the monthly rent to the landlord and, under the date of the agreement, The shop will keep only the contract of sale was not properly proved by the tenant in the proof of the tenant but the landlord's lawyer failed to prove the sale agreement was executed neither the square nor the Can present a slight testimony to the alleged act. The tenant was given sufficient time to prepare his proof of defense to the tenant The defense and the rent controller closed his evidence due to his delayed strategy and found that the landlord and the tenant were in between the parties. The relationship exists and the tenant's failure to remove the tenant's appeal against the tenant controller's order failed, however: On the sale of the alleged contract the shop set up a civil suit in his favor to complete the sale of the shop, When the required court failed to pay the case, the trial court asked the tenant to wait until a certain date. Meet the deficit in which he failed. As a result of the decision made by the tenant at the time of trial, the tenant filed a second case for the specific performance of the sale contract in favor of which the suit was finalized for the specific performance of the alleged sale agreement. Decision Civil power of attorney advocate Mangowal lawyer