NUSRAT MAI versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979); Grant. On the charge of adultery, he raised a severe fine without knowing about Islam and it was extremely unfair and his evidence could not be given much weight without a deep scrutiny which claimed that the prosecution. Witnesses have not been released. Undoubtedly, the benefit was to be found in the bailout phase as well, on the occasion of the arrest of the accused, a married woman, her co-accused, and the positive result of the Chemical Examiner was not evidence of the commission of adultery itself. Unless direct evidence is provided that a reasonable cause for the inadmissible role was presented, thus, the accused was present for further investigation of the crime which, pursuant to section 497 (2), guarantees the addition of CRPC. Has earned the right to The accused was released on bail on the basis of his sexual misconduct
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Washuk lawyer