ABDUL REHMAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Article 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court Code of Conduct, 1984, R42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OX, R4, the writ petition should be rejected for non-prosecution as the High Court refuses to restore such application. Was not appropriate He is an old man and a resident of a remote area, he could not appear before the High Court personally. That his lawyer was busy in front of another bench at the time of the trial. And that the application for rehabilitation was endorsed by the diary and that the affidavit of the lawyer will not be denied on the oath of the Vality Council generally by the courts appropriate for the non-petition. The petitioner will freely accept the request for rehabilitation after his / her appearance and his lawyer's court supremacy put aside the invalid order and restored the constitutional request to its original number.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
