Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN TAHIR versus CHIEF. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE

After accepting the soft lecturer position in R-23 Rules, the chief minister's employee's authority was reported for duty, but after requesting a longer leave, he went abroad to complete his PhD, After returning from overseas he reported for duty again, but he was not employed according to his report but he was given duty after about five to five months and due to absence from abroad without leave. No salaries were paid for this period, the period of absence of employees was formalized as extraordinary leave of employment, but The ruling did not comply with all the Chief Minister's Punjab Government Rules (Appointment and Conditions of Employees) Rule 1974 of Rules, having unlimited powers, the proper order of the Chief Minister as per the period of absence of employees As was formalized, it should have been implemented by the department that the employee was not physically involved or did not work or could not be adjusted against any position which the department All his weight was lost, because once the chief minister accepted the term of the employee, At present, the employee had appointed himself a public servant during that period and this was unpleasant. The Department should commend this decision best law firms from Pannu aqil lawyer