Find a Lawyer

ILA-UD-DIN versus D.C.

Ordinance of Banking Companies 1962 Section 83 (1C) State Bank had reason to believe that the accused were involved in the illegal business of banking and found out that in fact they were dealing in banking business and the public Was invited to invest since then. Prior to the company publishing in newspapers and their resignations were regularly accepted and they could not be held responsible for the actions of the co-accused. The lady was not proven against the accused, who was shown by the co-accused's daughter-in-law and through her as the company's directors, although they did not have any share of the proceeds from illegal sources. Was acquitted. jobs for advocates from Bahawalnagar lawyer