SAEEDUL HASSAN, EX-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
R 3 Due to the reputation of the public servant for having a permanent reputation for corruption, the four officers in charge of the charge were obliged to observe the sanctions, integrity and due process of all court officers and courts in the district. Witnesses against the civil servant were involved. If such officers could form opinions about their colleague (public servant) during the performance of such duty, it deserved the utmost consideration. I1aless influenced, discriminated against or encouraged. The impetus was that it was not, for the purpose of examining the merits of such officers, in writing to the CR ACR or reporting to an incoming high court judge that it was a baseless test record or when a report was to be submitted. There was a solid case to present and maintain and not just proof of reputation, such as being a corrupt employee Let's establish a lasting reputation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
