Find a Lawyer

ALLAH BAKHSH versus SHER KHANUM BIBI

On the basis of the Contract Act 1872 Section 235 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 41 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 115 suit which was sued for cancellation and sale of power of attorney. The order of the suit was upheld and two different amendments were filed. Against the same decision affecting two different individuals from the appellate court's decision, both parties claimed to be buyers for the price because the transfer in their favor was effected by the female owner's alleged lawyer. The second amendment was also made to the applicant. The party, the High Court, affirmed the appellate court's decision in which the plaintiff's (female owner) case was ruled out, and it was found that the registered power of attorney in favor of the alleged lawyer was fraudulent and fabricated, therefore, On the one hand, the High Court affirmed such decision by the High Court affirming the Bona fide transfer for the price fixed by the buyer, which was specifically rejected by the H igh Court attached against the general judgment. Regarding the request for review, which is pending throughout the petition, the applicants will be informed of the decision of the High Court and the Supreme Court. Incredible obstacles to cross for the redemption was specified under which the vendors of the exchange of non-attorney based options. On the one hand, it was a fake and fabricated finding on the basis of which the High Court and the Supreme Court had earlier decided, which came out of the general judgment, the court justified it while the High Court, despite hearing the review. Unlike previous results top advocates from Mubarik Pur lawyer