Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 382/395/411 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 Bail, Defendant's Grant Name The identification of the test, which was not taken into the RN number, was conducted under the supervision of a parade magistrate by arresting the accused. The only evidence against the accused was the recovery of stolen property from his possession. The question is whether under the circumstances the accused was guilty under section 392/395, PPC or under section 411/414. , PPC needs serious consideration The accused was in jail for more than six months without trial and the accused was released on bail in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.