MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SAHIWAL
Pakistan (1973), Articles 32 and 34 of the Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912, Article 199 Respondents on State and State Land Extension, in a report submitted by the authorities to the dispute between the parties. Applicants' stance was supported, however, by assuming that the realistic role and the same was resolved by the Colony staff on the occasion of inspection / limitation, that the process of constitutional petition cannot be such, regarding such dispute. A civil suit between the parties was also pending. He was ordered to act strictly in accordance with the law, and regardless of any foreign ideas, any kind of eloquence and eloquent administration is expected by the political figures to realize their responsibility in this matter. And will be present at the job. In such a case, its extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction was exercised by the High Court, in the interest of public intervention.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
