Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus ABDUL REHMAN WAHLA

Section 20 and 68 of the Canal and Drainage Act 1873 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 passed without hearing by the affected and interested parties on the directive of the applicant and the respondent in respect of the legality, participating in the specific outlet authority For the benefit of the respondents and the implementation of the additional water, which adversely affected the interest of shareholders, including applicants, without notice and without hearing them, for the rights of the partners. Approval of water effectiveness whether under a particular direction or appropriate action for relaxation of regulations From you Under the Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, it was illegal in the law to listen to non-interested parties; notice should be given to those affected by the order of the canal administration whether interested persons should not be given a chance. And inquiries to determine the terms of the water supply, it is not permissible to give additional rights for the increase of the respondents, the existing water course does not supply the approved water ion supply in favor of the respondents, which are the shareholders in question. The rights of the public, to comply with the relevant legal procedures and Persons cannot be allowed without issuing necessary notice. The order under the question, if at any stage, with the intervention and intervention of the High Court, the respondents are to be harmed, they will not have to bear any weight which There is no legal permission and no party can be protected and obligated to facilitate the benefit. The question to be struck is whether this is the case famous lower court advocate from Dadakhel lawyer