MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus UNION COUNCIL, THATHA KHALIL, DISTRICT RAWALPINDI
The Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Sections 137, 156 and 166 of Pakistan (1973), the enactment of Article 199 tax, challenged the direct legal treatment of appeals and representation before fixed forums without the applicant's constitutionality. And his recovery was challenged. The ordinance, provided in 1979, by the Union Council filing a constitutional petition without showing any good reason for neglecting such general treatment to request extraordinary treatment in the Tax / Fees High Court's debate on their goods. The appeals and general remedies represented were ineffective, as they were rejected only by the appellate, but before the governing authority having the extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, the utility of local councils under the abolition ordinance roll They had all the options to test and control the performance, which complied with the decision Six are from. It was important not only to allow legal workers to carry out the tasks allotted to their fields, but also to avoid a plethora of cases in the High Court, which could be effectively dealt with at the second level. Yes, the appropriate alternative treatment provided in the ordinance has not occurred before. Tired of angry applicants, the constitutional petition filed by them was not fit and was liable to be rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Hattian lawyer