Find a Lawyer

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR BAJWA

Agricultural Development Bank Ordinance 1961 Section 39 (2) (e), (f) and Book of Administrative and Disciplinary Powers under the Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan, Chapter 3, Para 3 showing promissory notes by an officer. Which has not been developed or endorsed. The authorized authority may emphasize that the employee against whom the disciplinary action was taken was not issued a show cause notice by the competent authority, from the rank of senior grade officers to the chairman of the bank, to the executive directors and executive directors. May be able to promote all employees except employees. The Chairman of the Senior Executive Directors was, therefore, unable to develop or redesign an employee, from the Executive Director to the Senior Executive Director, and to an officer who was authorized or promoted by a competent authority. Was not nominated, no one was authorized to issue showcase notices. The second employee of the Bank de facto ideology who provided that no other officer could be allowed to interfere with the judge's poor appointment or litigation between two private legal proceedings on the matter. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Shamsabad lawyer