Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IRSHAD AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD JAMIL


Section 151 of the Court of Law (LXIV of 1976), Sections 3 and 4, petitioners moved the petition under Sections 3 and 4 of the contempt of court Act 1976, on account of their willful disobedience to the Court against them. A disciplinary action was taken against. Response order disappointed Respondents Responding to disappointment Respondents have initiated false and unjustified proceedings against petitioners which can be terminated by proper and effective use of the provisions of Section 151, CPC. In order to provide the necessary support. The petitioners were converted into petition under Rule 155 of the petitioners under the contempt of court Act 1976, the unnecessary proceedings in the district court against the applicants were immediately directed to the rent controller / execution court. Canceled with Provide applicants with the help of police to take possession of the disputed house

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Karak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.