Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD JAMIL

Section 151 of the Court of Law (LXIV of 1976), Sections 3 and 4, petitioners moved the petition under Sections 3 and 4 of the contempt of court Act 1976, on account of their willful disobedience to the Court against them. A disciplinary action was taken against. Response order disappointed Respondents Responding to disappointment Respondents have initiated false and unjustified proceedings against petitioners which can be terminated by proper and effective use of the provisions of Section 151, CPC. In order to provide the necessary support. The petitioners were converted into petition under Rule 155 of the petitioners under the contempt of court Act 1976, the unnecessary proceedings in the district court against the applicants were immediately directed to the rent controller / execution court. Canceled with Provide applicants with the help of police to take possession of the disputed house law firms from Sakrand lawyer