Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID OURESHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Arts 199 and 212 Civil Service Appointment Constitution Petition In addition to the rehabilitation of the employees, the co-employee took the competitive examination and after qualifying the Income Tax Group co-employee was not satisfied with this division representation / appeal against such allotment was filed. And was again allocated central excise and customs. Since there was a vacancy in this group, the employee filed a constitutional petition challenging the response that such an amount had been allocated to the employee who had participated in the priority and despite having been discriminated against. He was subjected to grave injustice. In the case of merit, the co-employee is held in high esteem, but the government has the right to allocate any employer, any group or service, regardless of priority, the decision taken by the government. Was not open to challenge because no arbitrary power was exercised by the government arbitrarily. Co-employee famous supreme court advocate from Dijkot lawyer