Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 307/34 supported the prosecution case of three witnesses who were injured in the incident and they were also natural witnesses of the incident which they confessed to. It was just in front of the house. No enmity or illicit desire was expressed against the accused and no motive was even suggested for him to make any false accusation which was alleged by the prosecution and proved it. It was believed that the recovery of the assault weapon from the accused was proved by credible evidence. , Was consistent with several assailants who allegedly participated in the questioning No record was available on the record to indicate that the incident occurred without prior notice and without any joint intent between the three defendants. Was born The defense's explanation for the presence of the question is clear, reasonable and far from a possible prosecution, but after completing its case against the accused, they were tried by the trial court and their conviction upheld. Kept. advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer