AHMAD versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912 Section 24 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The cancellation of allotment of land without notice to the affected person, the land in question in favor of the applicant in the application was canceled and The respondents were then allotted. The petition requested that in lieu of his \ riverbird, the land of questions was allotted to him and hence the allotment was not available, the Commissioner of the Appellate Board of Revenue did not accept it; The Second Applicant also claimed that although the land could not furnish a copy of the Collector's order under which the allotment was allegedly made in his favor, the entry in the nam journal Walkati in has shown that the applicant. Was allocated to the applicant by a Friday enrollment order for specific years. As soon as the admission into the measles girdle revealed to the applicant that all such documents, unless denied in the proper inquiry, initially provided some support to the applicant's position that the question Under the land it has been allotted, though temporarily, in lieu of its ary riverbed, the question is whether such land was allotted to the applicant by order of the collector, or whether it is demanded by the river Buri. In exchange for land, the decision can only be made in a proper investigation and after examining the relevant records, Which inquiry can not wai, was no inquiry as to the appropriate collector. Defective respondents' unclean order of land allotment in question
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Dhirkot lawyer