Find a Lawyer

KHADIJA-UL-KUBRA versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, emphasized the option of puberty wife when her marriage was performed when she was a minor at the age of 4/5. And he had made such a marriage by exercising this right of puberty. When he was 17 (almost) his wife, when he made a statement before the court that he denied his marriage in the presence of witnesses 3/4 years ago, according to his birth certificate She was 22 years old. The following contentious courts were not justified in disputing, having family matters and exercising jurisdiction as parents, Khola's plea should also be raised, trial by amending the case to exclude the trial. The court should have allowed that too. The wife did not participate in the welfare of the parties because they had to continue separately that they had rejected their marriage by exercising the right of puberty, and were not excluded by the courts in the right view. Kinney, disobeyed and used illegally in the courts below, made several decisions simultaneously in the constitutional jurisdiction and allowed the parties to lead the case according to the law. The first decision was called. Proof law firms from Chashma lawyer