ALI SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
The petitioner is requested to submit the application in the application to be approved in accordance with the request of the applicant in accordance with the request. Petitioner, who had applied for the distribution of property in commercial plots in 1984, applied for commercialization of such property enhancement and according to the preliminary demand notice he deposited the required amount. During such controversy, the rate of commercialization increased substantially in the final plot in 1991, the petition was approved and the applicants applied in 1984 and the initial demand was similar (in 1989). ), Prior to the increase, applicants are entitled to a distribution / commercialization grant Was ill at the rate at which he made such a request and deposited the amount as per the demand of the authority before the rate of increase in 1989, only because the regular order was passed / issued. Was released in 1991. A portion of the authority will not grant it the right to charge, as a result, the imposed applicant has deposited the initial premium amount as per the demand of the authority after which it cannot be burdened with additional costs. , Under which respondents cannot charge. Increased rates
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Kech lawyer